Seems the Vatican doesn’t have a problem with it.
Just illustrates the problem many Darwinists have. They can’t handle a modern, mature look on God & Creation.
Also illustrates the problem many Creationists have with a limited view of the Creator.
Seems the Vatican doesn’t have a problem with it.
Just illustrates the problem many Darwinists have. They can’t handle a modern, mature look on God & Creation.
Also illustrates the problem many Creationists have with a limited view of the Creator.
The Vatican’s chief astronomer also declared ‘intelligent design’ - unscientific.
Considering that it’s been proven that bacteria is immortal under certain conditions (250 million yr old spores encased in salt have been cultured) it seems that NASA has geared many of its data probes to gather evidence of the possibility of panspermia, ie as with the Stardust Mission - collecting comet dust, searching for organic compounds, etc….
http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news108.html
>>The Vatican’s chief astronomer also declared ‘intelligent design’ - unscientific.<<
As have I. Something you can’t get through your thick head.
Panspermia, however, has two big detractors: 1, statistics (the odds of life developing elsewhere then flying through the infinite cosmos, surviving, landing on earth, surviving, and then starting life here) and 2, genesis itself, as life must have started somewhere, which is still the big entropic mystery.