10
Nov
11

The Primary Problem

Perry’s choke illustrates the error with marathon debate format– it focuses on one aspect (under pressure public speaking) while conveying answers that may mean something but have no content.  They can’t.  Explain health care in 30 seconds– it can’t be done!

But it’s what is expected.

The winner of last night’s debate was Newt Gingrich.  Herman Cain did well.  But neither candidate has $17 million in a Presidential Campaign fund.  And Perry did that in a shorter time than Newt, Cain, Bachmann, Huntsman.  It’s impressive he can garner such monetary support in such a short time.

Sure, we hate his debate performances.  And so long as he doesn’t get excited in a debate with Obama, he’ll probably do OK.  Obama’s weak on jobs, economy, foreign policy, golf– they only thing he’s good at is giving speeches, and a debate isn’t a speech.  Obama’s debates against McCain were not memorable, and they didn’t win his election.  Obama’s debate against Hillary didn’t secure his nomination.  Obama conned the masses into believing his hype, and it was something Hillary couldn’t compete with.  Hillary can’t deliver a stemwinding speech.  Chris Matthews isn’t going to get tingles from a Hillary stump.  But Obama could, and he built on that momentum.  Now that we’ve seen 3 years of Obama, we know his speeches are as worthless as his approaches to the green.  Perry, so long as he sticks to economic substance, he’ll stand up well against Obama.

But as Republicans we can’t help but look at a stage of 7 candidates and Mitt Romney and say, “Man, can we have someone other than Mitt Romney?”  So we’ve gone from Bachmann to Perry to Cain, and now Gingrich is rising in the polls.

But you can’t argue with Perry’s fundraising.  You can’t argue with his Texas record.  You can’t argue with his earthiness.  But we wonder if he truly has any transformative ideas, and if he does, can he communicate them?

And we wince.  And we say “Is this the best we can do?”  As a party, we want the best candidate.  And so far, on 30% of the party seems set on Romney, which leaves the other 70% grimacing.  Do we want gaffe-prone Perry?  Poorly-organized Cain?  Sketchy-past Gingrich?  Donkey-in-disguise Huntsman?  Isolationist Ron Paul?  Michelle “We’re Not Sure She’s Knows What She’s Talking About” Bachmann?

Someone’s got to be better than Romney, but nobody has the total package.  And Perry’s horrible gaffe was just that, horrible.  But who else can fundraise like Perry?  Is the one-time gaffe worse than Gingrich’s past marriages?  Is Perry’s gaffe worse than Ron Paul’s destructive isolationism?  Is Perry’s athlete’s tongue more damaging than Cain’s fumbling of sexual harassment charges?

Evidently it is, to some pundits.

But Perry has $17 million in the bank.  That buys a lot of forgiveness.  We can’t count him out.

About these ads

5 Responses to “The Primary Problem”


  1. November 11, 2011 at 8:37 am

    My husband came up with a trade idea. Perry can have an ad offering a trade: 4 years of good speeches and bad policy for 4 years of good policy and bad speeches. If you think that is a good trade, then Perry is the guy for the job.

  2. 3 Karen
    November 14, 2011 at 9:03 pm

    What concerns me as much as the candidate debate performances are the audience reactions.

    Have you been watching the GOP debates? I have.

    I’ve watched audiences applaud a large number of executions, applaud letting an uninsured man die, booing a gay soldier in Afghanistan, applauding torture/ waterboarding.

    Do you think these demonstrate good moral and Christian values?

    • November 15, 2011 at 12:20 am

      So, using that reasoning, it’s OK for rapes to occur in #Occupy protests, as well as drug sales, prostitution, murder & violence. But instead you’d rather condemn the immorality of State death penalty laws, ignorance that such people get treated one way or another (and often have their bills paid for), an ambush question that was answered in support of gay military by all candidates, and the use of enhanced interrogation against enemy combatants who already took up arms against the US to discover plots to kill vast numbers of Americans.

      Just so we’re clear, Karen…

  3. 5 Bigbrother
    January 3, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    IMO the problem with the debates is that they are a lot like dating, sometimes you can know too much. There is no mystery. Look at Obama, he got elected and no one knew anything about him. Why? People were able to put their words in his mouth.
    Remember how, on Seinfeld, Jerry used to date a girl and we’d wait to find out what was wrong with her? Imagine that episode ended 15 min in. Jerry would be married to Delores with the Man Hands.
    Seriously, by now everyone had said something to tick somebody off


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


About Me

My name is Doc. Welcome to my blog. If you're visiting from another blog, add me to your blogroll (and I'll happily reciprocate). I have a Ph.D. in Chemistry and live in Wisconsin. If you have any questions, feel free to email me. My email is docattheautopsy at gmail. (No linking to deflate the incredible spam monsters).

Categories

Archives

World Temp Widget

Blog Stats

  • 122,266 hits

RSS The Autopsy

The Autopsy

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: