David Roberts Follow Up

The transcript to the debate is over here. It’s an OK debate– too constrained to really provide any new information. However, there is one thing that is obvious– the Global Warming presenters, especially Schmidt and Somerville, are big on saying “that data is bogus” without providing any scientific basis on why it’s bogus. Lindzen was the star of the show, providing good insight and analysis while trying to engage in scientific discussion on the matter.

Low point of the evening? It’s this:

Well let‘s use an engineer, I don‘t think I‘d want to cross Brooklyn
Bridge if it were built by an engineer who only understood 80% of
the forces on that bridge.

—I, we, we…I think we might have a solution to the energy crisis,
we just need to tap Philip Stott.

While it’s funny on its face, it’s an ad hominem attack and does nothing to advance the debate. Nor does Schmidt explain why Stott is full of hot air, he just says he is. And that was typical of the evening.

I recommend you read it if you get a chance.


0 Responses to “David Roberts Follow Up”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

About Me

My name is Doc. Welcome to my blog. If you're visiting from another blog, add me to your blogroll (and I'll happily reciprocate). I have a Ph.D. in Chemistry and live in Wisconsin. If you have any questions, feel free to email me. My email is docattheautopsy at gmail. (No linking to deflate the incredible spam monsters).



World Temp Widget

Blog Stats

  • 131,738 hits

RSS The Autopsy

The Autopsy

%d bloggers like this: