20
Apr
07

Aquanet Moment: Sheryl Crow

You may have heard that Laurie David and Sheryl Crow are touring the country, “educating” people about global warming. (Nothin’ says college education on climatology like a tour with a TV producer and a rock star!)

But Sheryl had a major brainstorm on how to reduce emissions. I’ll let her tell you.

Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind, worth investigating. One of my favorites is in the area of forest conservation which we heavily rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. When presenting this idea to my younger brother, who’s judgment I trust implicitly, he proposed taking it one step further. I believe his quote was, “how bout just washing the one square out.”

How about just using your hand? Or a rag you carry around? Remind me to give Sheryl a Jose Canseco forearm bash instead of shaking her hand.

UPDATE: Even KKKarl Rove doesn’t want anything to do with “Frugal Wiper” Sheryl Crow.

Of course, the irony of this kind of talk is thick. A rock concert is once big pollution arena. From all the buses/cars/trucks needed to set up the stage & arena, to shipping in the bottled water, pop, alcohol, food, t-shirts, programs, and the tons of litter left over by a partying rock crowd– it’s just not an arena of conservation. But Sheryl derives most of her income from tours just like this, and she’s busing around the country talking about “reducing emissions”.

A commenter on her post, timmyslagle, provides a great retort to the critical analysis of one Sheryl Crow:

Trees are part of Agriculture. Like corn and wheat, they are planted by paper and lumber companies, with the full intention of being harvested. Were it not for the demand for wood products, a lot of trees would never be replanted.

A tree absorbs carbon from the atmosphere, and turns it into cellulose. When a paper napkin is disposed of, it goes into a land fill, and that carbon never returns to the atmosphere. Throwing away paper napkins (and used toilet paper) into the trash can is a great way to sequester carbon from the atmosphere. The more you use, the more carbon gets taken out of the atmosphere.

And while he’s mistaken (bacteria will break down paper just as they will a fallen tree, just not as fast), he really explains that the forestry industry does quite well in repopulating old-growth clear-cutting with new tree populations.

And I just had to repost these “FACTS” by guitarsandmore:

FACT: In 1950 there were just over 2 billion people on the planet. Today there are over 10 billion.

FACT: Each person who grows up in a developing country will use electricity for light and many other needs. Think, each person will want to buy a car and that car will spew pollution into the air. Each person will become a consumer of precious resources such as clean water, clean air, and fertile soil. Each new person will eventually become a polluter by purchasing goods that are not biodegradable.

FACT: It is the population growth that makes it a requirement to provide additional power sources from somewhere.

The hockey stick graph that Al Gore points to when he talks about carbon dioxide in the air can be directly tied to an increase in population.

In that case, he should be all for war. Kill people steal their resources, so that way they can’t use the resources, and there’ll be less people to pollute using those resources. All 10 billion of them (the other 4 billion are thetans– just ask Tom Cruise).

But to seriously suggest that we use “one square” without regard to the public health repercussions of such an endeavor is beyond stupid. It’s insane. And that’s why I’m handing Ms. Crow a can of Aquanet and a Zippo. Light ’em up, Dan!


16 Responses to “Aquanet Moment: Sheryl Crow”


  1. 1 K T Cat
    April 21, 2007 at 8:20 pm

    Maybe we could just hose her down as she walks out of the restroom.

  2. 2 Anonymous
    April 22, 2007 at 2:49 am

    She looks like she doesn’t eat, so what does she care?

  3. 3 Anonymous
    April 23, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    Ha, ha, ha, ha. If Sheryl practices what she preaches, she must stink to high heaven. Ha, ha. Let’s have TP Police installed in every bathroom to hand you a ticket for wiping too much. Bwahahahahahahahahahah. What a lunatic.

  4. 4 Anonymous
    April 23, 2007 at 5:40 pm

    Cheryl is a lovely lady, too bad she has a liberal bent…way bent. She also has a lovely tush and I can’t imagine that lovely tush getting by with a “one square” wipe…no way…front, maybe, but not back…if you get my drift. Nice food for thought, though, her trying to wipe her tush with only one square, both places…not gonna happen, Cheryl…

  5. 5 Mike
    April 23, 2007 at 6:19 pm

    I enjoy Sheryl’s music. It’s good groovin’, lyric nonsense. It’s not the Beatles, it’s more like the Beach Boys, but it’s enjoyable. I also like the Dixie Chicks.

    But, in the words of Matt Stone, “Why are you asking a celebrity for their opinion?” If David & Crow were serious about getting the word out about Global Warming, they’d invite some scientists along on the bus and the private jet.

    But they don’t. They never do. Remember, liberalism is all about.. liberals.

  6. 6 Anonymous
    April 23, 2007 at 8:12 pm

    Since head is full of rocks, of course she only needs one square.

    The main job is done by her mineral collection…brown stone, yellow stone, white stone.

    She uses the square to wipe off her fingers, thus saving soap & water, too.

  7. 7 Anonymous
    April 24, 2007 at 12:10 am

    Cheryl is so short-sighted. This problem has already been solved. Simply use the three seashells. Duh! That was thought of over a decade ago.

  8. 8 <a href="http://www.xanga.com/buy_levitra">Buy Levitra</a>
    August 18, 2007 at 3:58 am

    Great article! Thanks.

  9. 9 <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070818071347/freewebtown.com/loans1/payday-loans.html">Payday loans</a>
    August 18, 2007 at 10:08 am

    Nice Blog!

  10. 10 <a href="http://phentermine1.eamped.com">Phentermine</a>
    August 18, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Thanks for interesting article.

  11. 11 <a href="http://searcheng.site.io/index.html">Phentermine</a>
    August 28, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Thank You! Very interesting article. Do you can write anything else about it?

  12. 12 <a href="http://buy-levitra--ooz.blogspot.com">buy Levitra Online</a>
    September 4, 2007 at 9:09 am

    Very interesting site. Blog is very good. I am happy that I think the same!

  13. 13 <a href="http://search.cnn.com/search?query=site:m1.aol.com/phentermine4">Anonimous</a>
    September 9, 2007 at 6:01 pm

    Nice! Nice site! Good resources here. I will bookmark!

  14. 14 <a href="http://courses.cvcc.vccs.edu/ENG112_GROSS/_Chat_Room/000008fd.htm">Anonimous</a>
    September 9, 2007 at 11:25 pm

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

  15. 15 <a href="http://m2.aol.com/LorenLynn03/index8.html">Maxwells</a>
    September 10, 2007 at 4:04 am

    I see first time your site guys. I like you🙂

  16. 16 viagra
    September 25, 2007 at 6:19 am

    Disaster is likely to wreak havoc in the life of an individual as soon as he becomes victim to erectile dysfunction and the most significant dreadful consequence of erectile dysfunction is that the afflicted man becomes incapable of facilitating erections required for sexual intercourse. The sexual vacuum resulted from erectile dysfunction prompts the sufferer to opt for anti-impotency pills, most especially the viagra medication that was approved by FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) as a clinically effective drug to cure erectile dysfunction in men. Viagra is meant to be administered by patients only after availing of viagra prescription from the doctor. The prescription for Viagra provided by the doctor spells out that the patient suffering from erectile dysfunction seriously need Viagra to treat his disorder and further authorizes the patient to avail of Viagra from the pharmacist.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


About Me

My name is Doc. Welcome to my blog. If you're visiting from another blog, add me to your blogroll (and I'll happily reciprocate). I have a Ph.D. in Chemistry and live in Wisconsin. If you have any questions, feel free to email me. My email is docattheautopsy at gmail. (No linking to deflate the incredible spam monsters).

Categories

Archives

World Temp Widget

Blog Stats

  • 129,290 hits

RSS The Autopsy

The Autopsy

%d bloggers like this: