Burkha? Nijab? Yes! Chastity ring? No!

(h/t Michelle)

Seems that a British school is preventing a girl from declaring her purity.

LONDON, June 22 — At a time of passionate debate over religious clothing and emblems, a 16-year-old member of an evangelical Christian movement protested in court on Friday because her school has refused to allow her to wear a so-called purity ring, symbolizing her commitment to premarital chastity.

The case offered a counterpoint to a broader discussion concerning Muslim women who wear the full-face veil known as the niqab. But it also revealed stirrings of resentment among some members of Britain’s Christian majority, who say they are the victims of discrimination over how they display their faith.

[…]In a statement to the court, Leon Nettley, principal of the school, Millais, said, “It is not a Christian symbol, and is not required to be worn by any branch within Christianity.”

“It is never simple to draw boundaries,” he continued. “If we allow one set of pupils to wear rings symbolizing one particular message, when that item of jewelry is not required by their religion, then doubtless other pupils will then demand to be able to wear jewelry symbolizing other messages.”

Now, the superintendent has a point. The girl can remain pure if she goes without the ring, and it’s not a requirement by her religion, so no taboo is broken if she doesn’t wear the ring. However, a girl not wearing a niqab would be beaten for such a display of “sexuality”.

Is it an overreaction? I think so. The ring is a religious symbol, and students shouldn’t be restricted from wearing such symbols, just as I’m sure the married faculty aren’t prohibited from wearing wedding bands (which are purely symbolic and not required by their religion).


2 Responses to “Burkha? Nijab? Yes! Chastity ring? No!”

  1. June 16, 2013 at 2:54 pm

    You do not want any hard surfaced to come in contact with the soft
    delicate skin of your little one. What makes bassinets so popular
    is their portability. A toddler bed is often used when the baby gets a little bigger.

  2. August 1, 2013 at 11:17 am

    The solid nature of Casio’s G-Shock brand as well as increasing functionality drawn sports enthusiasts, manual workers the ones with an adventurous streak. Finally, using the sturdiness and ruggedness with the G-Shock Frogman, in addition to the engraved Frogman emblem about the stainless-steel back, this is unquestionably an adventurers watch that is really a popular choice among both all scuba divers and non-divers equally. It is often a little different to set the alarm between G-Shock watches.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About Me

My name is Doc. Welcome to my blog. If you're visiting from another blog, add me to your blogroll (and I'll happily reciprocate). I have a Ph.D. in Chemistry and live in Wisconsin. If you have any questions, feel free to email me. My email is docattheautopsy at gmail. (No linking to deflate the incredible spam monsters).



World Temp Widget

Blog Stats

  • 131,290 hits

RSS The Autopsy

The Autopsy

%d bloggers like this: