A new study of peer-reviewed articles has revealed something shocking– scientists are refuting the Anthropological Global Warming hypothesis!
But I thought there was consensus, and that anyone who wasn’t part of the consensus was a shill for Big Oil. Looks like there’s more shills than previously thought (including me, and I’m still waiting on my check, Big Oil!)
From the article:
More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun’s irradiance.”This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims thata scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850,” said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.
Other researchers found evidence that 3) sea levels are failing to rise importantly; 4) that our storms and droughts are becoming fewer and milder with this warming as they did during previous global warmings; 5) that human deaths will be reduced with warming because cold kills twice as many people as heat; and 6) that corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate.
Shills! All of them, shills! You cannot dispute the Goracle!